Written by Thomas Mutsimba, an author, an Enterprise Risk Management Professional. Thomas is an author endowed with advanced actuarial analysis and advanced forensic analysis

Rating Agencies have become a topical matter in Global Risk dynamics. Postured at national economies and their governance levels delineating to entity debt-equity risk dynamics, they are always at the forefront of depicting their opinion analysis regarding the rating architectures deverberated at classical rating scales. Rating Agencies are independent reviewers of global entities and domestic entities financial positions focusing on aquarian distance period analysis of debt-equity costs positions on a seasonal and adhoc basis. This definition is not a common definition, but it is a definition that lays bare what is neither revealed nor understood; what is the aquarian distance period analysis? It is the analysis of financial positions degenerated to input fundamentals at actuarial acquired skill sets from lands that are afar. But because data is beamed on world wide web sites, it is readily available to the public or users of rating agencies reports. Aquarian here postures the life cycle that comes with a better rating position for any entity or national government.

We spoke of debt-equity dynamics. Why are we singling out these components; that is the debt-equity one? It is because this is a huge contributory functionary factor of the position of Rating agencies posturing quasi PESTEL dynamics or fundamentals meant to asynchronate opinion positions stated in rating classes. Information is available on the meaning of the rating classes but there are five positions that come out, that I have studied but these positions or factors, risk bound are not easily seen. But through analysis and visionary gifting deverberating though my writing, I serve the world with my opinion. This opinion will stand the test of time when dynamics shift between preferences for Rating agencies to use and also whether nations or entities will hold the advice of existing rating agencies and their brands. There are five components as alluded to, that I will explore in the next paragraphs:

Component 1: Rating Agencies Capital Preservations Proportions outlook

Rating agencies now; as they look at the risk factor of politics in nations have factored in premium risk root-cause effect quantum factor in Capital Preservations proportions outlook. What are Capital Preservations proportions outlook? Capital Preservations proportions outlook refers to retention of capital input fundamentals ratios that posture debt to equity Solvency fundamental portion effect on the overall outlook of the entity. This fundamental is the most universal one because not much in terms of a thorough fair view of truthfulness or veracity of how the risk quantum factor component is calculated. Nations in the developing world, so as they are called find themselves clutching at straws, squabbling on what decision factors to take.  In order to appease the methodical decision opinion postured by Rating agencies, Capital Preservations proportions outlook are foremost calculated at risk premium rates of classification and ranking of outlooks using unconventional, not fully disclosed predictive analytics of where nations are. Preserved Capital is retention-based Capital. As one scenario and revelation may come out for large global entities that are looking for capital or foreign direct investment to improve their product or service offering Capital Preservation ratios, proportional outlook is not the best way of determining the real exposures. One question that has come to the fore of the markets of mostly developing nations is the influence of the political environment on key strategic decisions of national importance as well as their foreign policy decisions. The following has come to the fore:

• Solvency ratios of politically disposed nations;
• The agricultural factor or food production impact on food sustainability;
• Economic structural adjustment programmes that do not resonate with the pattern of development of these nations;
• Specialist advisory that is too dependent on rival western economics which are at the later stage of maturity;
• Capital Preservation-physio methodology. What is this? This is a never seen and never heard methodology that postures the masculinity of economies basing on indexed demographic factors rooted in unfair profiling that does not consider other architectures that exist in different nations. Demographic posturing and profiling is rampant but it is difficult to quantum-base in risk analytical factors. To give an example, African economies are in no doubt immature phases of development and of course measured by Independent risk consultants factor-reports. A factor report is a trigger momentary risk tenure that proffers investment platforms an opportunity to tactically allocate debt-equity imperatives on National Statements of Accounts in Governance Authorities. Now, looking at western nations; their debt structure built in Industrial and Manufacturing economies; their debt-equity ratios posture different views. If you delineate these fundamentals to enterprises in nations on earth you are bound to have a scale of balancing positive and negative factors tilting both sides and both ways. Why is that so? It is so because there are other factors that are rooted in architectures of both nations that is the developed and developing. Hence, therefore, what is the best solution? The best policy is not single-handed view based on authoritative or bureaucratic view but to draw up key non-political but all-encompassing policy. I write this in my own view, and it is imperative that Rating agencies re-look at their methodologies. This is not a political article, but it is a constructive degeneration of actuarial view rooted in economic architectural fundamentals of all entities.

Debt traps will be imposed. But how do debt traps get imposed? Debt traps are imposed through superimposition of befitting views of development without understanding the course path, the rooting architectures of nations. Note that debt is a big trap for entities or nations trying to get off the ground.

Component 2: Risk Analysis. The modelling of Rating Agencies actuarial monitoring systems

What are we referring to on this component? We are referring to using actuarial modelling at a detailed level of risk analysis or profiling of nations. As opposed to the exercise of circulating questionnaires that are based on a tick box approach, the world yearns for. Modelling here, is required for Rating agencies using perpetual Actuarial techniques. Why is this important?  It is important because in my view risk analyses undertaken now are flawed. You will probably be told that Rating agencies are manned by highly educated teams. In my view a process elements approach is required to beef up their work on nations. Teams must be aware of the impending architectures or structures in these nations whose sole focus is to focus on censorship motion of risk investment policies. Impending risk possibilities come from individual interests of nations that are overarching.

The risk discipline is not an academic exercise, at least it is in others view but succinct proper risk analyses to aid the work of Rating agencies is required. Vibrancy in their independence is not attested to because of their location or the supposed education laden tenets of the Rating agencies and their work. The world will need a paradigm shift in this tenet of world-wide financial institutions who require certificates of good and sustainable ratings to be released in order to unlock funding. The following is noted in the Analytical Rating agencies risk modelling:

[1] The genesis of architectural oblivion;

[2] Rating agencies lag behind in using advanced actuarial techniques monitoring from a universe strategic approach;

[3] Unequal playing fields as far as rating is concerned;

[4] Boards and Committees of the world entities lagging in the powerful use of advanced actuarial analysis that focus on input fundamentals that are critical to drive economies;

[5] Dependence on debt. Although debt is considered cheaper in the long run it destructs innovation requiring continuous working capital;

[6]Rating agencies today only come at their will or when invited [adhoc] but the truth is Rating agencies are only required when a quest for new funding or regulatory laws inspire them to do. Of course, the world will say it is law. But of course, law does not operate in isolation to the true patterns of unfamiliar business architectures. The world lags because of self-imposed oblivion. Self-imposed oblivion is the great threat as it chokes the spirit of truth in handling rating matters;

[7] Rating agencies subjugate and subdivide the world. These architectures of separation by regional economic groups create clusters that give an uneconomic and inappropriate view of the entire face of the economies of the earth. The world is viewed with actuarial sense for it to make sense. This author, with special interests in actuarial analysis and forensic analysis writes from a dimension of visionary glory of sustainable wealth creation and sustained management of risk models that seek to optimize revenue.

General Rating agencies are those agencies that do not ascribe to the specifics of a particular narrative. Unfortunately, what happens behind the scenes is unknown to the public. Economies in Africa and the rest of the world comprises of people who are hardworking and who are crying for a better sustainable wealth creation portfolio management.

Component 3: Rating Agencies today to do not have techno-divisional partial separation of roles of Institutions

Legislative institutions and international institutions sit at their round tables. But they sit there at the auspices of their law. The world, the risk universe is bubbling with terse architectures, real terms and real Business Intelligence [BI] that is neither practical but that speaks of a landscape that is endowed with resources. This author writing is a scribal gift because he neither studied nor sat in a class but because he operates from a higher dimension; everything is grafted in analytical gifts.

The risk universe requires techno-divisional partial separation. Technology as a core-binding tenet in economies is the one that fosters techno-powered divisional partial separation. Leveraging of algorithmic generation of commands in actuarial models, a lot can be discerned by these Rating agencies. In actual fact, it is a lot. It is a lot in the sense that Rating agencies must not operate as quasi-partial agents of subjugation but the truth and real growth instigators. Of course, the nations let alone the public are not privy to the adjudicated languages or jargon used by the so-called Rating agencies. Masses bear the brunt of oblivion as they are not educated on what a Rating agency is. Nurturing the decelerated fundamentals using actuarial techniques is the proliferating education in academic terms that does not inspire practical application of rating methodologies and techno-powered actuarial testing on economies of developing nations. This for so stated is a contentious issue as debt doldrums loom for many nations that are at the end of the market. Techno-partial separation improves and encourages incubation detention-based reporting that is lacking in various facets. Actuarial analysts will impend the finance arena in the future. It is a done deal in the other dimensions. True structures built on powerful BI.

Component 4: Actuarial Platform Tense

The Actuarial Platform Tense. What does it mean? A platform tense is the motion dynamics of actuarial input fundamentals in economic modelling of financial leverage data that comes from populated models. This actuarial tense is a perspired status quo driven by a variety of fundamentals. Motion dynamics that are currently wreaking debt-equity positions of nations do not posture real time issue-based listing of what needs to be done by Rating agencies.

Rating agencies are not economy managers neither are they economy securocrats. It is a dangerous scenario for the sinking debt profiles of nations. The Actuarial platform tense is misappropriated. It is nurtured in the degenerative populative opinions built on global perversion of asymptomatic architectures. But they run deeper into opinions of ratings that are not built on powerful real time BI meant to improve the nations. Again, it is a nutty issue.

Component 5: Actuarial views insufficiently perpetrated. The Emerging market trends

Since we note that Actuarial views are insufficiently perpetrated or deployed in the rating of nations debt-equity positions, there are emerging market trends. Trends that are even showing, themselves up. What are we talking about here? Global Rating agencies wielding unannounced power, authority and dominion over unsustained nations reeling in the phases of immaturity and transformations. Emerging trends must be on the radar of Global Risk Professionals. It is not an issue of recording standard events in the Risk registers but “black swan”, the  adage comes to mind. It is a nutty issue. Market trends are posturing themselves in the following ways:

• Product and Service optimization booming through innovation that cannot keep pace with debt-equity positions;
• Economic growth miscalculated. Of course, critics would say there is no empirical evidence; this is symptomatic of this world where the seen architectures posture a view nullifying the impending architectures;
• Huge deficit of cognitive thinking on quantum risk-based assessments;
• Impending architectures are consuming reserving to such an extent that labor issues, dwindling income per capita is being miscalculated;
• The fact that market trends are based on singular attributes. What does it mean? World Global risk is not the same. Until the professionals start recognizing risk universes impeding from other galaxies, this world will not be elevated to high revelations of actuarial mechanics;
• The world is not there yet. The talk about industrial revolutions is a very low phase of innovation;
• Incapacitation is at a very  high level;

This article on Actuarial mechanics of Rating agencies is an introduction to technical aspects of these mechanics. I will further elucidate my visionary view of what is about to happen. As I have already alluded to, I write from another dimension of visionary glory. This piece will be referred to in the fullness of time.    

Disclaimer: All views expressed in this article are my own and do not represent the opinion of an entity whatsoever, with which I have been, am now, or will be affiliated with.

Written by Thomas Mutsimba, an author, an Enterprise Risk Management Professional. Thomas is an author endowed with advanced actuarial analysis and advanced forensic analysis

Energy efficiency is coming in the utilization of energy at effective rates per input versus output comparison indexing motions. Energy, flowing at conversion platforms and or modes is critical to an industrial blossoming as it drives productivity and even revenue generation. Energy efficiency utilized at compartmental level of production lines is also utilized at exterior compartments and or levels outside production lines. Base stations of telecommunications entities also use different sources of energy to power base stations.

Base stations are platforms reverberating signals towered at those locations through channels set up to connect with various locations. They do not operate on their own. Why is that so? It is so because they beam signals to and from various locations, but they need an input of energy. Energy is current deep form through various devices such as diesel or petroleum powered generators or generic electromagnetic currents produced from other power generating units. In this article we dwell on the use of energy employed by these base stations to eccentrically power these stations in the ambit of telecommunications.

Energy efficiency in base station operations is the dis-aggregation of energy fundamentals to produce power meant to enable electromagnetic signal deverberation, digitally supported tenets casting energy to populate at minimized usage for calibrated magnified output per input of the aforesaid injected energy. Efficiency utilization is meant to make use of a quotient that saves power for operations calculated technique. Utilization of energy in base stations is also defined at energy levels proportionalisation. But how does it happen? It happens at a very detailed level of operations scheduling of base station routing and configuration management techniques. Base stations through configuration management are marred by dashboard reporting of calculated performance tenets. It is postured at the knowledge base of the configuration engineer who must appropriate the techniques of energy efficiency and how the telecommunications entity appropriates energy itself and associated utilization fosters the base station efficiency utilization.

It is a technical exercise and sometimes a mathematically astuteness-postured dynamic that dis-aggregate the aggregation of energy efficiency utilization for the purpose of elucidating to the telecommunications fraternity on the optimization components that when aggregated cause tandem operation right from continuous operations research and deployment to efficiency utilization of the base stations operations optimization.

Operations Optimization, Base station Dynamics   

What is operations optimization at base stations? Since base stations operate on the running scales of the engineer’s quest to ensure all calibrated instrumentation that are employed in posturing the reverberating technicalities of signals being beamed in scintillating motions to the field, it becomes an Ethernet based terse aid recorded ascertained methodology.

The telecommunications engineers are regularly needed to record scheduling operations right from resource requirements in terms of power/energy needs required to run the base stations. Operations record cards detailing all specifics broken down to calibration scheduled times of energy proportions needed and how the proportions will be apportioned cyclically as telecommunications engineers understand the surrounding field performances and the blend of frequencies that will be competing with concerned firm’s frequencies.

How does it help your entity? It helps your entity to plan according to the strengthening methods needed to ensure emerging needs are harnessed and efficiently utilized to optimize the base station operations. We are going to focus on considerations from base station operations management that accost the operations universe in order to optimize harnessing utility optimization entrenched in the efficientization quest. It is not an easy conundrum to break especially when looking at energy deficits. Nations are battling with crippling energy deficits that posture themselves in economies at unknown levels. Base station operations optimization operates on the following four tenets:

[1] Energy power needs, the injection efficient dynamics;

[2] Calculative Index of power consuming input components;

[3] Power scintillations;

[4] Energy efficient frontiers, usage efficiency and performance efficiency energy frontiers;

The modelling approach of the four co-efficients stated above are:

[1.1] Energy power needs, the injection efficient dynamics

Any base station in telecommunications has energy power needs. Efficient dynamics of energy power needs come in different formats. In this section we focus on injection efficient dynamics, Injection efficient dynamics are how telecommunications deploys energy to base stations. Measured and inverterised base stations must be digitally topographically postured and algorithmically managed.  What do we mean by this? What we mean is that each base station must be managed through a calculated motion of censored deverberation and reverberation of energy power needs.  Consumption of energy matrix to calibrated linked instrumentation that consumes the energy will give monitoring and evaluation. Algorithms are used to develop a component and or input like fundamentalist approach where all inventory consuming energy are linked energy efficiency-consumption calibrated instruments that give an indication as to the injection efficiency dynamics. Holistically and or at least at a high level, injection efficient dynamics can be measured as follows:

From the above illustration there are three channels through which energy is injected into the component architecture of the base station [depending on your modelling of injection efficient dynamics].

The energy proportion consumption index is a factor calculated by the quantified value of energy injected as a proportion of calibrated instrument indicator of base station component consumption of the energy injected into the base station. Abnormal losses or losses are computed using indexing measurement bases based on national or regional calibration of measurement bases used to measure losses indexes.

[1.2] Calculation of Index of power consuming input fundamentals

What is the calculation of index of power input consuming  input fundamentals? This refers to the methodology used to identify power consuming input fundamentals. It wouldn’t hurt to explore here. In fact, Actuarial skills or analyst skills are a crucial blend as they will come in handy to help develop and sense indexing. What is Indexing? Indexing is the summation of a series of data relating to identifying input fundamentals. The data in this case relate to the base station components. For instance, base station input components that consume energy an include:

• Tower cardiotic structures such as antenna receptors ;
• Conversion of receiving instrumentation;
• Signal conversion, amplifying, reverberating and deverberating instrumentation;
• Energy transformers;
• Energy power invertation instrumentation;
• Earthing or power surges harnessers or decelerators;

The list above are examples but they are many components that depend on brands of manufacturers of base station equipment and electronic standardization. Therefore, the indexing that may be used may be proportional indexing or performance indexing . It also depends on actuarially postured through electronic telecommunications engineering advisory status on the base station optimization configuration management.

[1.3] Power Scintillations

What are power scintillations? Are power scintillations energy scintillations? I would say no; power scintillations are not energy scintillations. Why is that so? You will see why.

Power scintillations are traction centered engineering effective momentum of telecommunications instruments. When energy is injected into a base station equipment and tooling system, the energy through electromagnetic current effective nature voltaic injected, instruments will be triggered to function. Power measured at energic effect that causes the traction in instrumentation motion control allows instruments to be driven towards functional abilities. Therefore, power scintillations are therefore the traction control mechanism that is energized by injection energy. Going deeper into the esthetics of power scintillations, they affect the energy optimization balancing dynamics. Energy optimization optimization  balancing dynamics are interior and exterior based. What does this mean? This means that there are factors that affect the energy-frontier dynamics .

These factors are design specifications and efficiency calculative motions of instrumentation just to name a few. The instrumentation that is being talked about now is base station instrumentation

[1.4] Energy Efficient frontier, usage efficiency and performance efficiency and how all of these are interrelated

Energy Efficient frontiers feature in many industrial instrumentation and control efficiency systems. What are Energy efficiency frontiers in light of base station efficiency optimization tooling?

Energy efficient frontiers are stages of decomposition of active energy, not passive energy. What is the former and what is the latter? The former is energy that has not been decomposed while the latter is energy that has been decomposed. Decomposed energy is energy that has been distributed to various parts of an ecosystem. The ecosystem of a base station is the base station itself and its inner components of instrumentation and tooling. Remote algorithmic command center of the base station also consume energy that we have postured to active and passive energy. Passive energy also features in energy lost.

Usage Efficiency    

Usage Efficiency is postured in standard energy consumed equilibrium analysis. This equilibrium analysis is reflected in the energy consumption index  of  a base station optimization. How do you measure the energy consumption index? The energy consumption index is measured at energy input intricacy. The input intricacy of base station energy consumption index is the balancing portion of energy highs and lows due to field frequencies vibrations or fluctuations. Due to instability postured by competing field frequencies the energy consumption index may be affected.

The incoming frequencies postured by other field base stations competitors affect energy usage efficiency of the base station. This one is postured in the energy consumption index which is a measure of energy usage efficiency.

The energy consumption index is calculated using statistically notated data serialized indexing of calibrated energy units of bases measured. Indexing measured proportional and disproportional acceleration and deceleration of units of bases measured against normal industrial standardization instrumentation calibration measurement gives input to the state of usage efficiency.

Performance Efficiency

We have run through the usage efficiency. Performance efficiency is another tenet of base station efficiency frontier. What is performance efficiency? Performance efficiency is a measure of base station energy stability per compartmental deverberation of signal frequency. This is designed through programming of the flow of stability over a certain period of time. We will cover more in the management of performance of energy of a base station in highly industrialized nations and or economies . Performance efficiency is difficult to measure because of several heterogeneous and homogeneous factors in the energy efficiency dynamics universe. But it goes as far as the strategic objectives that would have been set by a telecommunications firm.

Generally formulated Energy efficiency utilization and optimization at a base station

What is this generally formulated energy efficiency utilization and optimization? This is the officiated frontier of efficiency at a base station determined through compartmental methodology set to deploy new technology to the operation optimization of base station. Open efficient frontier dynamics are susceptible to agile development of new energy sources. For instance, an entity can use nuclear powered base stations. These nuclear-powered base stations come with different energy efficiency utilizations and operations specifications or rather nuclear power engineering at the base station may totally be different as opposed to other sources like diesel or petroleum, or solar powered plants.

Energy methodology deployment to base stations must not just be treated as a simple one. There are efficiency frontiers that even affect the operation optimization.

This article has touched on the varieties and a cocktail of issues regarding base station energy efficiency utilization. Energy efficiency frontier computative optimization uses at those base stations may be extrapolated to new generation technology. This is an emerging or meteorite ball of higher dimensions revelations still to approach through innovation.

Disclaimer: All views expressed in this article are my own and do not represent the opinion of an entity whatsoever, with which I have been, am now, or will be affiliated with. ©

Written by Thomas Mutsimba, an author, an Enterprise Risk Management Professional. Thomas is an author endowed with advanced actuarial analysis and advanced forensic analysis

Industrial Manufacturing Systems use quite atricious formulants in their production processes and or manufacturing systems. Atricious formulants are blending methodologies that are complicated and sometimes not easy to decipher. Industrial manufacturing systems, a beacon of formulant usage embedded in the tenets of process value analysis. This article focuses on quantum basing of Industrial manufacturing systems using Investment Analysis. In investment analysis we are elucidating here, a view is postured in the view of an Actuarial analyst. Why do we delve in the Actuarial analysis tenet at this stage let alone in the investment analysis of industrial manufacturing systems? It is because there are quite a number of enterprises, rather small to medium size manufacturing entities and even larger and established ones that still cannot manage industrial manufacturing systems at a rate of censored motion with a quest to regulate quantum analytical production systems in order to improve the Return on Investment [ROI]. This tenet, however, is not only postured from a theoretical view but it is postured more so at a much greater emphasis of practicality and analytical view.

Investment analysis captured in this article is an articulation of quantum risk management built through the core fundamental approach. Quantum risk management is a degenerated process embedded in actuarial modelling techniques meant to posture sensitivity analysis of investment risk scenarios at a pace exacerbated by impending input fundamentals. Industrial manufacturing systems are no mean feat of course, when it comes quantum risk management but through Investment analysis the target investment risk scenarios are tested through modelling built-up approaches.

The reason behind Investment Analysis of Formulants  

Investment analyses as defined above are a reason for ROI  management articulation in industrial maintenance of sustainability. Through a censored motion detection of quantum-based analytics, it is an input that will lead the organization, at least towards the desired destination. The desired destination; however, is to ensure that formulants injected into the production line systems are input fundamental tested at investment analysis of investment risk scenarios optimizing the degeneration of efficient fronts. However, what is this that we are talking about? We are talking about a quantum-based approach to actuarial analysis.

Now this revelation comes to me in unimaginable proportions espousing advanced actuarial analysis and advanced forensic analysis. Enterprise risk management embedded in my grafted skills serves Industrial manufacturing entities at their bay of bottleneck ridden processes. Optimization mixes decelerated at the rate of efficient consumption in the production line beaming up the analyst view, the actuarial analysis.

Investment analysis focuses on core-factors, but these factors are “magnetized”. What does this mean to magnetize core-factors? To magnetize is to bind interrelatedly factors together towards a targeted section or compartment using formulant ridden analytical views. The four investment factors are as follows:

[1] Investment basing;

[2] Investment actuarial mirror;

[3] Compartmental specific ratio;

[4] Status of investment risk scenarios;

[1.1] Investment basing

Investment basing is the fundamental market bases; mainly the market fundamentals impact on the investment drive of the entity. Investment basing is calculated in two ways; as follows:

• Investment basing by input index;
• Investment basing by proportional allocation of project funding built in working capital requirements;

Investment basing is crucial and important as it is quick basing of bench marking and measurement. Project investment appraisal would have been done at initial phases possibly at feasibility study level. The decision investment risk scenarios that pass the test of maximization of investment basis at a scenario of making profit or of sustainability results in a choice; a choice of optimization mix that fosters optimization formulants ratio.

Investment basing uses actuarial mathematical acceleration and deceleration techniques. The purpose of motions of acceleration and deceleration is to render formulant deployment at a rate or velocity of optimized efficient front. Now out there in the industrial world the formulant methodology is not advancing through the efficient frontiers’ motions. Why is that so? It is so because lack of traction in development of advanced investment analysis algorithms that push for gradual deployment of formulants investment risk scenarios rooted in actuarial modelling.

[1.2] Investment Actuarial mirror

 What is an investment actuarial mirror? An investment actuarial mirror is a superimposed vision of the industrial manufacturing system through terse development of gentric phased actuarial modelling, upheaved on dashboard like posture of formulant analysis. Various formulant analysis scenarios are created against a mix of various risk investment scenarios. What does it mean? It means that the mirror will posture atritious practicable solutions on a dashboard and a decision will have to be made. Small to medium entities now adays lack efficient frontier-built mirroring of investment analysis attempt to factually optimize industrial manufacturing fundamentals rooted in formulant analysis. Formulant analysis and deverberation into an industrial manufacturing system is a real possibility. All these stages I have alluded to work best if actuarial models are used to ensure that the employed investment analysis produce efficient frontier scenarios.

[1.3] Compartmental Specific ratio

Investment analysis of formulants to be employed in the industrial manufacturing system uses compartmental specific ratio. Compartmental specific ratio is an industrial mathematical ratio that is exclusively specific to the industrial manufacturing system. This ratio is tersely separated from other ratios. How does it get separated? First and fore most the ratio is a ratio of formulants impact index. The formulants impact index is for instance; if formulants are made up of a chemical mix, the chemical mix made up of four chemicals for the industrial manufacturing systems. Since chemicals are ranked according to the grade of corrosive impact, proportional divisional posturing is calculated. Grades of corrosivity extent will be used to choose the ranking of employment of chemical mix of corrosive impact. Therefore, the formulant impact index. Thereafter calculating the formulant impact index is employed in separation fundamentals. Separation fundamentals posture the calculated formulant index against the compartmental efficiency frontier.

Where does the investment analysis come in? Investment analysis comes in using the efficient frontier cost input fundamentals using actuarial techniques. The actuarial techniques here involve identification of efficient frontiers defined at cost input imperatives. These when identified will be factorized with the specific ratio [defined for the compartment] .

[1.3.1] What is the purpose of the Specific ratio?

The Specific ratio applied against the results of the investment analysis will result in a benchmarking index formulants considered at various points of industrial manufacturing lines of productions. These methods work best if algorithmically employed to calculate the concerned fundamentals. Benchmarking is mostly used as an optimizing agent for industrial manufacturing lines to boost ROI.

[1.4] Status of Investment Risk scenario

What are Investment risk scenarios? Investment risk scenarios are set state of assumption of the impact of formulants on the industrial manufacturing line ROI. The “state of assumptions” is generally a “what if ” scenarios of different formulants mix impacts on Industrial manufacturing impact. Stress asymmetry is an important element for Investment analysis of formulants used in Industrial manufacturing line or production line. Stress asymmetry will give impetus to the quantum basis decision investment risk.  It is not a one size fits all, but it is a focused methodology postured in a variety of methods.

My next article will deal with the type of formulants indexing methods that may be employed in Investment analysis in Manufacturing line systems analysis.

Disclaimer: All views expressed in this article are my own and do not represent the opinion of an entity whatsoever, with which I have been, am now, or will be affiliated with. ©

Written by Thomas Mutsimba, an author, an Enterprise Risk Management Professional. Thomas is an author endowed with advanced actuarial analysis and advanced forensic analysis

Nuclear Atomic commands, the reverberation of nuclear driven algorithmic commands that are built not only through scientific and industrial studies but through methodologies. The methodologies spell out the commands nature of data generated in Nuclear Power station operations. Nuclear Power station operations posture a different scenario or state of affairs as opposed to other power statuses for instance petroleum or diesel power.

Due to the deep and advanced nature of Nuclear energy that is harnessed at advanced level of atomic laboratory forensic discoveries. This postures a need to reverb these terse hidden trails of atomic commands.

This revelation comes to me in unimaginable proportions. Deep seated advanced forensic analysis and advanced actuarial analysis of this tenet is at the bay of my heart populating visualizations coming to me without opening any book. I cannot keep this to myself but serve the business fraternity. Blessed, I must birth revelations of knowledge out. I ooze with this advanced knowledge.  Unraveling the skills grafted in advanced forensic analysis and advanced actuarial analysis, I aim to focus on Nuclear Atomic commands and asynchronated to posture actuarial modelling of Nuclear Power station operations optimization.

Nuclear Atomic commands. What are they? 

Nuclear Atomic commands are defined as the coding of nuclear energy fundamental energetic atomic chemical compounds in nomenclature as centrifugal harvesting and component scaling as matured from centrifugal cylinders to the enrichment transfer degeneration.

These Nuclear atomic commands vary. They vary based on nomenclature of genetic atomic compounds as mutation of corrosive radioactivity spasms increase. But how is this monitored?  This is monitored through advanced forensic analysis where compound tables denoted in chemical tabular categorization matrices. These matrices are however cast across compound characteristics with nuclear atomic optics assisting with the data base of examinations. Due to the large amount of data that Nuclear scientists or nuclear physicists must work with, a nuclear power station is very complex and dangerous. What would be the reason? It is because nuclear specialists will need to go in and out of the nuclear enrichment cells clad in protective clothing and gear.

Where monitoring sensors are linked to Nuclear monitoring central command center. Uranium deployed from cast mining shafts is handled at very high standards. All these processes require cautious data handling and integrity maintenance to the vast importance of the monitoring tenet.

Monitoring here is postured at venerated frequencies where data is optimally recorded according to the documented lay out policies and procedures. This topic seeks to expand Enterprise Risk Management at a Nuclear power station. Optimization of Nuclear power stations operations is a key tenet.

But before we deal with the actuarial modelling of the Nuclear power station optimization we must expound on the components, at least critical ones that are considered in Nuclear atomic commands. Nuclear atomic commands however venerate the power station operations scheduling and resource deployment through motion censorship . Motion censorship at a Nuclear power station is a very important aspect due to robust monitoring technicalities that come up out of hazardous radioactive motions. As an Enterprise Risk management professional models actuarially, the optimization of operations under secure conditions, it remains to be seen if innovation will provide a solution for analytical challenges in the Nuclear energy industry. Analytical challenges exist in the Nuclear power industry due to the nature of optimization postures. Revenue generation becomes a critical component that races against value analysis results from compartments of Nuclear power operations processes. Generated from a bird’s eye view, this generation of Nuclear energy deficits wreak the impostering technical formidable output that comes from generation of Nuclear power.

Dangerously postured and criticized, Nuclear energy gives every entity an opportunity to focus on compartmentalization of energy efficiency in their defined efficiency frontiers.

Components of Nuclear atomic commands

The components of Nuclear atomic commands are quite many. But in this section, we will illustrate modelling critical commands. But why are we focusing on actuarial modelling critical commands? The reason being that model critical commands are genetically critical for optimization  of Nuclear power station operations. The optimization model is meant to effectively and efficiently generate revenue at critical levels due to generic danger of corrosivity of radioactivity fundamentals. Some of the components are:

• Molecular Analytical chemistry generation;
• Atomic nuclear structures:
• Data postures and serialization of atomic molecular structures;
• Gentric phased data structures and the phasing approach codes;
• Molecular analytical physiological presentation command;
• Generally formulated structural adjustment of Nuclear energy atoms;
• Algorithm development under Atomic nuclear molecular motion;
• Data dashboard fixtures;
• Generic nuclear energy operations indicators;
• Infusion of molecular data codes. Their commanding nature in operations directions;
• Molecular analytical models;
• Innovation risk indicator command;

Stated above are components of nuclear atomic commands. Their significance; these commands are seen in how they direct methodology of Nuclear power station operations optimization via infusion of analytical actuarial models. We will cover more on the components’ directive structures of each command at a Nuclear power station.

Analytical Actuarial models. The Optimization of Nuclear Power station operations

Gentric phased Atomic molecular analytical model

A gentric phased approach is an actuarial model that focuses on phasing out of generic model analytical fundamentals over the nuclear power generation enrichment process built in centrifugal cylinder maturity. What is this? This is a cost-input atomic molecular imperative as the gentric phasing motion spasm degenerates through maturity. This can only be done if you know the compartment efficiency dynamics of the Nuclear power station operations optimization. How do you know the compartmental efficiency?

The compartmental efficiency is identified as follows:

• Generation of nuclear power right from uranium enrichment process at a centrifugal rate of deployment. What is this? As each centrifugal cylinder is deployed to extract energy, efficient frontiers are identified and notated in a certain way in the actuarial model.

• Component structure of nuclear atomic loss index. This is the structural compartment of the loss or abnormal loss expressed in nuclear measurement bases. The loss index results in the efficient frontier impact. This happens at compartment phases. Each compartment has phases along Nuclear power generation. The loss index is also used for phased provisioning of losses that are captured as a cost in the generation income statements.

• General formula-a formulant basis: Nuclear power generation is chemical compound based. Generated at studied and or examined atomic structures that signal the enrichment dynamics. What does this mean? It means that the formulant basis actuarially calculates at the atomic index mix proportionally and disproportionally postured at cylinder maturity measurement basis will phase in the general formula. Additives, but not chemical additives per se but pressure-volume-rotation of generator motors as energy is released induce impact extent which can also be quantum based at scientifically postulated co-efficiency of functionary formulation analysis.

• Nuclear power station locator of periphables. What is this efficiency frontier? This refers to the ability of the Nuclear power station modelling optimization agent to locate atomic periphables in motions of spasms injected by atmospheric pressure -volume metric. Atmospheric pressure volume metric is also used at the Nuclear power station as it has an impact of incubation emissions. What is the impact of incubation emissions? Incubation emissions under Nuclear power station operations blend with the Nuclear atomic periphables and also impacts viscosity element of nuclear energy.

• Formulated Tetrazine. What is this? This is an oxidizing agent in Nuclear reactor velocity of enrichment that can postulate itself in radioactivity maturity duration. This is also an efficient frontier that can offer Nuclear power station operation optimization.

As I have alluded to, after determination of efficiency frontiers, my next issue will focus on employment of efficiency frontiers as optimization indicators in the quest for Nuclear power station operations optimization.

Disclaimer: All views expressed in this article are my own and do not represent the opinion of an entity whatsoever, with which I have been, am now, or will be affiliated with. ©

Written by Thomas Mutsimba, an author, an Enterprise Risk Management Professional. Thomas is an author endowed with advanced actuarial analysis and advanced forensic analysis

Nuclear energy revelation has been on the production line of Enterprise Risk Management writing that has been at the fore. Nuclear energy, a high impact source of energy but at the same time riddled with energy harvesting bottlenecks. Not much education has been issued or published to the masses or communities in many nations concerning this source of energy postured as hazardous many times. Perhaps the question is to be answered by those who specialize in its enrichment tenet or the line of production.

Quantum Nuclear Molecular analysis is a tenet that focuses on the coding of volume driven esthetics of atomic structures of uranium compounds destined for release through enrichment processes. This molecular analysis is quantum-based focusing on assignment of special measurement bases of molecules at a much-detailed level. This write-up’s thrust is on the Nuclear atomic molecular data using specialized techniques and models. In this article we are going to demonstrate Quantum Nuclear Molecular analysis using advanced actuarial techniques.

The Actuarial models to use

Since quantum molecular analysis is performed through use of a model. Actuarial models play a key role. What are these actuarial models? Actuarial models come in to break the Nuclear molecular analysis tenet into fundamentals that are defined at the level of a variety of Nuclear ribbon site originalization. Nuclear molecular analysis, quantum-defined, is an egregiously superior field of study and research but it has limitations.

The attempts to use actuarial models to break the nomenclature of Nuclear molecular analysis are real and it happens at speed of intelligence of algorithms that are designed or written to amass, identify, reveal, report and monitor the ribbon site fundamental of the uranium enrichment fundamentals. We posture at this stage the modes of Actuarial models that we will use to give impetus to the Nuclear molecular analysis. The models will be illustrated as follows:

MODEL 1: Nuclear Porous ribbon site

The Nuclear porous lite is a calibrated deliberation of Uranium-Nuclear bound fundamentals in the mode of molecular periphables. But how are these expressed? They are expressed as follows:

[1.1] Molecular quants 

Nuclear quants are actuarial analytical variables that categorize the molecular characteristics of Nuclear. These characteristics are stated as follows:

• Quants phantom mode. This variable is not easily seen. But how do you express quants phantom mode, one may ask? The quants phantom mode is expressed in the following items:

[1.1.1] Quants volume-pressure metric measurement.

 [1.1.2] Quants atmospheric voluminous expression-measured at the volume proportional output of emissions.

 [1.1.3] Generally quantified actuarial cost input fundamentals. The dimension of measurement here is to start setting up the cost fundamental foundation. Many dimensions of measurements may be used and or different depending on the price quants.

 [1.1.4] Quants risk analytics behavioral trends. How do you measure Nuclear molecular quants risk analytics behavioral trends? These are measured at the temperamental non-plausible, non-propitiatable events likelihood and impact. Postured scales of classification and or measurement may be used but the scales of measurement in the Nuclear energy or Uranium enrichment are very different. Why are they different? They are different because of scientific and technologically postured variables that are hinged on inverse quotients. What are the inverse quotients? Inverse quotients are quotients or binary reflected measurement bases that sometimes go beyond the binary posture reflecting unrelegated fundamentals. Unrelegated fundamentals in actuarial science are fundamentals that remain at the surface of quotient and they do not drill down to technical specific of the inverse quotient, but we said that the inverse quotient reflects the binary measurement basis. Bases and dimensions are two different nomenclatures in the field of dimensional measurement mathematics. But why is that so? It is so because the former reflects a series of measurements while the latter expresses the value of what’s being measured.

More so in actuarial mathematics we posture inverse relationships as co-efficient variations. Co-efficient variations move in different semi-consular photo stated reflective variables. Molecular physics to be specific is tersely represented in Nuclear molecular analysis.

 [1.1.5] Actuarial Formulation of decipherables

What do we mean by actuarial formation of decipherables? Here we mean actuarial formulation of decipherables is certain formulation of what is not realistically determinable in nominal terms, but the opposite is also true. It is true because for so stated it venerates the actuarial impossibilities into possibilities. Quantum molecular physics and quantum molecular analysis stands as an osculated tenet of periphables transformation along the Nuclear ribbon site line. But those who study molecular physics and or Nuclear molecular analysis today stand akin to confusion. What does it mean? It means that they are studying things that they do not see and neither do they have revelation of the foundation architectures of what they are studying or examining. But how can they see; that is the big question. They need to understand the foundation of the realm of molecular analysis. This is no easy or mean feat, but we can demonstrate here using actuarial modelling. Let’s say you want to model Nuclear energy efficiency. How do you go about it? First and foremost, define the scope to be impacted by the Nuclear molecular periphables. The following steps are followed:

• Scope formulation and determination;
• Calculate fundamental bases;
• Base selection and redirection indicators;
• Perform risk analytics for planning execution;
• Generic termination phases;
• Model deployment in Nuclear laboratory;
• Injection of scope determinants;
• Nuclear atomic diffusion for analysis;
• Model stress tests under uncontrolled environments. This fosters the strength of stress tests under nucleic ribbon lite peripherals;

[1.1.6] Determination of the tense of the Actuarial model

Determining the tense of an actuarial model is the determining the mode. What does it mean? The mode of an actuarial model determines the likely direction of the likelihood quotient permutation in risk diadem quantified risk tenet. This is a very crucial proponent or part of Nuclear molecular analysis driven by actuarial modelling. However, the tense of actuarial modelling has four permutations. The permutations are as follows:

• Perception quantification range;
• Predictive analytical Nuclear molecular tenet that is magnetized in atomic motion of Nuclear molecules;
• Total tense range that is computed using quantum mathematics. What is quantum mathematics? Quantum mathematics is a division of calculative mathematics that is both statistical and mechanics built. The mechanics tenet of Quantum mathematics is part of Risk engineering tenets. The Risk engineering tenet includes the following:

1.     Mathematical risk calculative scenarios;

2.     Formulation of risk diametrically imputed principals of the quotient designed to factor Nuclear molecular analysis;

3.     Generation of algorithm pinned molecular quotient factors;

4.     General reporting analytics;

5.     Data of Nuclear molecular movement;

6.     Data algorithms that continuously written to aid Nuclear molecular analysis. This is a necessary posture to enable motion of censored nuclear molecules mutation.

7.     Indexed-based degeneration. But where does the index come from that would be the question. Indices are calculated or computed at motion sensory parts of nuclear mutation analysis. This is done using compound formula mutation mathematics. Do you know that there is compound formula mutation mathematics? To give a sneak peek, compound formula mutation mathematics may be expressed as follows:

 From the above movement what do you deduce? The above compound formula that is complicated means from left to right the compound has mutated to another state. The Risk engineering tenet makes using one of these to create an audit trail and also to use the formula as a base of input into an Actuarial model that accommodates mutation revealing the change in the status quo.

However, this article shows an introduction to the sceptics of Nuclear Molecular analysis using actuarial models. This dosage reveals directional fundamentals that an Enterprise Risk Manager on a quest to model Nuclear molecular analysis of nuclear energy firm or an enrichment plant by laboratory forensics should use. In my next article issue I will focus on steps followed in detail on Actuarial formulation of decipherables. This is deep Nuclear analytical technology built in the actuarial modelling science. 

Disclaimer: All views expressed in this article are my own and do not represent the opinion of an entity whatsoever, with which I have been, am now, or will be affiliated with. ©

International Standards on Auditing [ISA], an embodiment of a framework of procedures employed to execute the attestation assurance providing tenet to various stakeholders are on the horizon of assurance. This collective nomenclature of the tenet of assurance has been issued for service of industries for a long time by the International Standards on Auditing Board. This article, serving the nations of the world seek to layout in the open what has not been told of regarding the International Standards on Auditing Boards. Nurtured through robust consultative processes espousing quality characteristically a process driven component of assurance, it is a tenet used by Auditors and Assurance providers. International Standards on Auditing however guides and give credence to assurance services provided by entities ranging from professional practices to internal division of firms. What has not been told of are not the functionary effects of these International Standards on Auditing but their nature, genetic mutation in industrial fundamentals. Using analysis gifts that consistently nudge me and present themselves to me in visionary elucidation of who I am, I stand to share through advanced forensic analysis and advanced actuarial analysis. 

Volumes and volumes of ISAs written by professionals through knowledge and consultative processes are a “creature”; a design of deficiencies or gaps noted. Written from an Enterprise Risk management view analysis, I proffer a critiquing view of the ISAs. I do not know of any revelations that have been written or given concerning these during their actuarially hidden formation or mechanics that have been recorded to show the world assurance architectures coming in. What the world doesn’t know is not what the world should know but it is what the world must yearn to appropriate and learn in formation and application of these auditing and assurance standards. Just applying the International Auditing and Assurance Standards is as dangerous as reporting omissions or commissions without understanding the functionary effective tenets of these standards. We will explore using process elements formation and fundamental component approach what the world doesn’t know with regards to International Standards on Auditing as well as the assurance tenets. Attempting to deduce and show simplistic national components postured at a global scale is quite an imperative education laden gesture.

[1] The Formation Architecture and Mechanics of International Standards on Auditing

What do you know about the formation architectures and mechanics of these? These are proffered from a simplistic understanding of preview and report. Here, formation of ISAs is fortuitously not much postured at known levels, but it is postured to a business world that deems that the ISAs are legitimate in every aspect. Here, we will bring out the science of audits and assurance and the flaw laden formation mechanics for the world.

The formation architecture and mechanism are here connotated using the Balance of Portion of Assurance structures. What is the Balance of Portion of Assurance structures? A balance of portion of assurance structures is a principle of assurance transformation structured over a censored motion of these such that over time the assurance services structures become disproportionately efficiently broken as there is a per capita population over the section of the business being reviewed. What does this definition mean? It means that there are structures that are not seen on structures of assurance services. What are these structures? The structures are the assurance components assertions used in external assurance services. These are:

[1.1] Completeness

[1.2] Existence

[1.3] Accuracy

[1.4] Valuation

[1.5] Obligation

[1.6] Presentation

These structures, however, are not fortuitously determined, but they were determined as testing assertionary effects whose representations are provided by management. However due to the environments of assurance and auditing, it is the perturbed state of the business growth fundamentals that cannot absorb these. Even though management is educated, the art of business science and the art of accounting science absorptionally deterred by decelerated input fundamentals of business optimization models, we cannot explain these assertions. These assertions are outdated, deverberated in business metamorphosis through innovation.

This may be difficult to understand but those who have studied deeply stand to lose deeply because of lurk of unforeseen architectures built in the sands of time meant to render business unprofitable and unsustainable. Professors and Philosophy doctorates must prove their specialization. What does this mean? It means those studying business are researching only in a dimension that has been superimposed. This casts a limitation on the ability of the decomposed assurance tenet espoused in International Standards on Auditing. We note that the International Standards on Auditing posture a complementary phosphorous effect. What is this complementary effect?

A complementary phosphorous effect is a populative stagnant business science art. The populative nature of the International Standards on Auditing is null and void. One would want to argue that they are built on the demands of business and if the demands of business change then they are improved. The formation nature of business is not a propitiatory solution to seek new assurance standards. As we have already alluded to earlier, the balance of portion effect comes into play. While it comes into play, new frontiers of efficiency decelerate the effect of assertions that the International Standards on Auditing are trying to achieve. To achieve this, this requires a center of focus patio superimposition of impending efficient frontiers of a business product or service optimization mix that is driving growth in revenues. But this can be difficult to understand as people or professionals are limited to what was written for them by those that caught the flicker of impending architectures of the modus operandi of the art of business science; the art of accounting science and the art of assurance and audit.

For so stated, the ISAs are irrelevant. Though my analysis is rooted in the scribal analysis gift, this piece poses questions to the elucidative objectives, strategically set by Practice Boards of International Standards on Auditing and Assurance as a tenet rooted in the impending balance of portion.

The intention of the balance of portion is propositioned to be a scale of a universe of factors pulling in different portions. Perhaps my question can be answered. Why is it that Auditors cannot devise new methods of solving deficiencies raised or at least identify why the profession is under scrutiny? The profession is under scrutiny because of impending architectures. They hold meetings and meetings but those are not solutions to the scourge but only reports covering themselves saying that procedures are not a 100% detective representation of fraudulent activities. It is the impending architectures. It takes years to research the art of business science pitfalls; the art of accounting science pitfalls and the art of assurance and auditing. For so stated, statements will be added to the reports to protect the profession from prosecution that comes after reports [assurance and auditing] have already been issued concerning fraud that occurred during the year which has not been detected by Auditing standards. It is not a nutty issue, but it is reality. Impeding architectures; impending architectures in business science.

[2] International Standards on Auditing determined indexed architectures 

What are determined indexed architectures? Reviewing or attesting to the veracity of subject matter being audited is prone to the emergence of indexed determined architectures. The determination of indexed architectures is an exercise of proportionally quantum computing of the annulling architectures brought through the art of business sciences; the art of accounting science. Indexes, although they are used in other areas of the art of business science; the art of accounting science, they aren’t pictured right in the International Standards of Auditing. Why is that so? It is so because the whole education system of Auditing Theory is perspired from a world view of either what was written at old architecture level or what was stated through studying of auditing. However, the irrelevancy matter comes in five forms. The irrelevancy and unreliability wreak its ugly head in the dilemma that the audit profession faces today.

Professionals practicing in the Auditing arena today are consulted on matters whose architectures they no longer understand. I have been propping up or encouraging in my series of articles the use of actuarial techniques to give real terms view as opposed to nominal terms view of the status quo of the business. This matter will be controversially viewed because of the protectionist attitude that pervades the arena. The evidence is right there in the profession’s face, but the profession plays around with figures, holding consultative sessions that do not give credence to the status quo. The fact that there are no answers to why procedures of assurance and or auditing, do not expose the impending architectures of a fraudulent nature is not because of a sample approach or methodology but it is because of stagnation in assurance and or auditing innovation in response and in tandem with the growth of impending architectures.

The Standards; I am utmost afraid are irrelevant and unreliable because of impending architectures. Clauses have been put to state that external assurance services such as external audits aim is only to state the truthfulness and fairness of the financial status. The impending architectures have outgrown the sustained tenacity of the profession to respond appropriately to threats casting aspersions through fraud. The profession must wake up because the profession’s lack of knowledge does not mean that there are no impending architectures.

[3] International Standards on Auditing are built on a system of preposition

This means that the International Standards on Auditing are built on a system of propitiation. What does it mean? ISAs are built on a system designed to appease the status quo. What is this status quo that is being referred to? The status quo that is being referred is the 5 core principles that are principalities based. They are:

[3.1] The adjudication of economic fundamentals that are not tested fundamentally espoused in stress asymmetry;

[3.2] Principally, for so stated it is the nature of vast political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal environment factors that ascribe to where the profession wants to go. But because the profession is rooted in certain principles that are stagnant that do not move in the higher echelons of glory, the status quo stands akin to impending architectures. The assertion representation of management of global entities and domestic entities embodied in the status quo is set at a pace of decelerated universal finance-economic technological partition of economic tenets. Center-based analysis in a universe of various algorithmically postulated models renders the standards on Auditing irrelevant. Arguments will be postured against the author of this revelation because of aspirations to maintain the status quo. The status quo will sink generations and generations to come, professionals will come and go but before they depart, they will undoubtedly unturn and churn out what they have experienced over years and decades. But what they have experienced will not be useful because it will be rooted in the status quo that rejects tenets imposed in the risk universe by the impending architectures. It is just a system of letting people wake up, go to work and get paid but without much revelation of the willed high echelons of standards of Auditing that will depict a new age of glory of finance to come. Again, the profession must wake up. Irrelevancy is the adjudication of deficiency syndromes. This global economy is not even developed; it is still lagging because of stagnation espoused in irrelevancy and unreliability of ISAs.

[3.3] The International Standards on Auditing are asymptomatic of the nature of impending architectures. Let’s take for example the proliferation of digital finance transactions and their related skills. The profession will keep going in circles saying these have not been tested. The crucial tenet to look out for is the velocity of approach of meteorite ball of impending architectures. Humanity let alone the profession quotes things or statements that were spoken by philosophers from way back. There are architectures or personalities who have been enlightened by the echelons of glory and forewarned the economies of impending architecture of new innovations or threats. The tenets today, that the profession ascribes to are irrelevant. This world let alone the business world that is so revered as advanced is not even an inch closer to the destined glorious business age. But alas it is not seen because of the overarching adjudication of irrelevancy and unreliability. 

[4] Standard Patio-like postures

What is or are patio-like postures? These are the financial and mechanical tenets of new age International Standards on Auditing. The world clamors for leadership that is visionary and not leadership that dwells on the age of conventional methods of assurance that has proven to be irrelevant and unreliable. Total Quality Management of International Standards on Auditing is present at disproportionate terms. What does it mean? It means disproportionate terms are terms set to allocate professional resources quotient dynamics. Professional resources quotient dynamics are efficient frontiers compartments in the churning out of assurance and or audit opinions on subject matter presented beforehand. Board room entrances the sit in scenario. What is a sit in scenario? A sit in scenario is a scenario meant to show how assurance and auditing portfolio of decision-making opinion stands the pressure of market forces to show the direction of the current status quo business architectures. It is measurable through the following considerations:

[4.1] Number of total quality management iterations in the risk universe;

[4.2] The status quo of the integrity-truth efficiency index based on iterations categorized by industry growth and the number of mishaps or fraudulent acts reported;

[4.3] Prosecution bound legal cases that are patio sit in postures for conclusions by mandated Boards and committees;

[4.4] Efficiency frontier index: it is a measure of the opinion making process compartments velocity that drives the innovation population frontier. The innovation population frontier index is the degeneration of cast in stone frontiers to show the consistency of the drive by the assurance and or auditing standards to outgrow stagnation. These can be grafted by writing algorithms that destruct repetitive nature of assurance and or auditing opinions.

[4.5] General formulate on of critically powered assurance and or auditing techniques;

 [5] Nurturing Management Reporting

How does it happen? Management reporting in the context of International Standards on Auditing happens through the selective and caution bound standard application and analysis. Application and analysis is not cast in stone but it is built on the substance over form principle. If Authorities choose to see the light of the untold truths about ISAs, they will boost nurturing Management reporting.

My next article issue will focus on moderation of standard indexing efficiency frontiers.

Disclaimer: All views expressed in this article are my own and do not represent the opinion of an entity whatsoever, with which I have been, am now, or will be affiliated with. ©

Written by Thomas Mutsimba, an author, a Risk Management Professional. Thomas is an author with special interests in advanced actuarial analysis and advanced forensic analysis

Actuarial data modelling has been covered a great deal in the series of articles I published on this platform. I have started off with a very high level overview. Actuarial data modelling is regarded as complicated, requiring very highly skilled people to carry out the nudging task of solving problems in the markets.Now, here on this article I focus on demystifying Actuarial data modelling to proffer a view to the enterprise risk management audience and the audience at large. Demystification of actuarial data modelling will be done at a unique level.

What is Actuarial data modelling from an Actuarial analyst view? Actuarial data modelling from an Actuarial analyst view is modelling that focuses on examination of modes of degeneration of model input fundamentals in business optimization architectures.Why is business optimization crucial in the quest of an analyst? The main purpose is to test and prove that the optimization imperatives are working best to achieve goals encapsulated in the strategic imperatives of the organisation.

Now this definition has one missing synonym. The synonym being referred to is the quantum risk universe that interacts with the business optimization initiatives aimed at ameliorating the effects of opportunity cost forgone as a result of certain decisions made by the organization. The Actuarial analyst concerned has to be wary and be ready to recommend quantum risk defined bases that strike at least strategic imperative-input fundamentals balance. The account of the role of the Actuarial analyst of the future must be backed by quantum driven and tested methodologies that stand the impending risk universes.

The analyst must never forget that actuarial data does not perspire on its own or independently. The vernacular tab of data perspiration possibilities gives impetus to demystification of binary data algorithms. Why are we referring to binary data algorithms? Binary data algorithms are methodic meaning algorithms which are transformative in two sets of characteristics. The characteristics are:

1. Algorithm determination quantum base
2. Formulative datum base perspired in high income entities

Algorithm determination quantum base

This refers to deep seated programming language that documents advanced algorithms meant to drive the technology powered evolution of actuarial data modelling. How does it work? It works based on the evolution of data to minute advanced components. The minute advanced components are basically the degeneration of actuarial models to where the business decision challenge is. The Actuarial analyst role has been compacted and blanketed under a narrow view of business science. Business today is in need of highly astute and cognitive thinking driven analysts. Organisations today are optimally lacking because of deficient business optimization models. Entities are outpaced by other entities because of the astuteness of blossoming entities in this area. The algorithm quantum base forms three phases and they are as follows:

1.Quantum base genesis

The genesis of a quantum base will be defined from the velocity driven motion censorship population from business intelligence statistics. Velocity driven motion censorship is a tool that improves and creates opportunities for a product or a service model development at an accelerated pace. Enterprise risk management reports must be able to articulate actuarially determined data driven input fundamentals as reportable indicators that are powerful. Boards and governance structures must be educated on the impacts and volume-powered data population in the business optimization mixes.

2.Quantum bases genesis is the future

As opposed to just indexing input imperatives for determining the evolutionized results without equipping governance structures within boards with education. This is the only way business can improve coupled with initiatives to improve corporate governance structures.

3.Quantum bases genesis is advanced

Those interested in Actuarial science and how it powers the generic architecture of data models. No man can move alone; let alone be an island and aspire to grow without interaction with the universe. Quantum bases genesis will be explained further in the the future issues of articles with a focus on Quantum risk management.

Formulative datum base perspired in high income entities

A formulative datum base perspired in high income driven entities is a censorship algorithm characteristic that degenerates through the populative architecture of data perspiring through a business model optimization input fundamental . The input fundamental perspires based on motion censored decision when quantum risk analytics informs the data model optimization directional strategy.

Generally formulated data algorithm policies will posture this motion sensorship inspired strategic imperative. Characteristically the status quo in today’s actuarial data modelling algorithms written in languages such as python do not have these advanced sense of algorithms.

For so stated, every Actuarial analyst through training and development instituted by Institutes and Faculties of actuaries must change their focus. Analysts and actuaries will become irrelevant if they are not equipped in this manner. This is even the same scenario with other professions whose tenets are driven by actuarially determined data.

The focus under this section has been targeted on high income entities. Is it because small to medium income entities do not fall under this formulative datum base? They do fall under this base but high income entities whose investments in algorithm developments for data modelling are the most hit by deficiencies in business optimization models.

Product or service optimization models driven by actuarially determined will face these developments alluded to. The notion of technological velocity is a dangerous risk investment scenario. What does this mean? It means technology is a trigger functionary coordinating factor in scenarios among the motion censorship tenet. Generally it is a done deal, data centers hosting business data will need massive integration capabilities.

Capabilities phased approaching data modelling is the generational transformative nature. Nullifying the current status quo of the actuarial analyst job will be the evolutionary nature of data coming from legacy systems.

The Actuarial analyst roles and responsibilities

The Actuarial analyst is responsible for the following:

• data architecture formulation triggering actuarial reporting and quantum based risk analytics;
• deceleration of input fundamentals in approved actuarial models to strategically position the entity for profitability and sustainability;
• formulation of supportive actuarial architectures informed by motion censorship data development algorithms.
• product and service model optimization fundamentals alignment to injected actuarial modelling scenarios meant to give stress asymmetry tenacity.

Disclaimer: All views expressed in this article are my own and do not represent the opinion of an entity whatsoever, with which I have been, am now, or will be affiliated with.

Be yourself; Everyone else is already taken.

— Oscar Wilde.

This is the first post on my new blog. I’m just getting this new blog going, so stay tuned for more. Subscribe below to get notified when I post new updates.

This is an example post, originally published as part of Blogging University. Enroll in one of our ten programs, and start your blog right.

You’re going to publish a post today. Don’t worry about how your blog looks. Don’t worry if you haven’t given it a name yet, or you’re feeling overwhelmed. Just click the “New Post” button, and tell us why you’re here.

Why do this?

• Because it gives new readers context. What are you about? Why should they read your blog?
• Because it will help you focus you own ideas about your blog and what you’d like to do with it.

The post can be short or long, a personal intro to your life or a bloggy mission statement, a manifesto for the future or a simple outline of your the types of things you hope to publish.

To help you get started, here are a few questions:

• Why are you blogging publicly, rather than keeping a personal journal?
• What topics do you think you’ll write about?
• Who would you love to connect with via your blog?
• If you blog successfully throughout the next year, what would you hope to have accomplished?

You’re not locked into any of this; one of the wonderful things about blogs is how they constantly evolve as we learn, grow, and interact with one another — but it’s good to know where and why you started, and articulating your goals may just give you a few other post ideas.

Can’t think how to get started? Just write the first thing that pops into your head. Anne Lamott, author of a book on writing we love, says that you need to give yourself permission to write a “crappy first draft”. Anne makes a great point — just start writing, and worry about editing it later.

When you’re ready to publish, give your post three to five tags that describe your blog’s focus — writing, photography, fiction, parenting, food, cars, movies, sports, whatever. These tags will help others who care about your topics find you in the Reader. Make sure one of the tags is “zerotohero,” so other new bloggers can find you, too.